3 ms·
> IM (Teams, Slack, etc.): Actual communication lol good luck doing Slack Thread archeology instead then. (I'm not experienced with Teams but since its Micros
by jasonvorhe 1y ago
> IM (Teams, Slack, etc.): Actual communication
lol good luck doing Slack Thread archeology instead then.
(I'm not experienced with Teams but since its Microsoft, it's likely worse.)
- skydhash 1y agoIM (if not a dialogue) is best treated as a room full of people. Anything that spans more than two back and forth should better happen somewhere else.
- nottorp 1y ago> lol good luck doing Slack Thread archeology instead then. The OP pretends they're actually placing all info into organized documentation in ... Confluence or something. I suppose in real time as the slack thread develops, because they aren't going to find anything a week later... > (I'm not experienced with Teams but since its Microsoft, it's likely worse.) Slack is a paragon of usability compared to Teams. My guess is no one in the OPs organization remembers email etiquette. In theory with proper quoting you won't need to review all messages in a thread because the most recent one already has all the info. Tbh i use email style indenting even when replying to Slack messages.