So it boils down to "let collusion go unpunished this one time, because we did your job for you!". Right. Not only would it create a precedent in letting collu

So it boils down to "let collusion go unpunished this one time, because we did your job for you!". Right. Not only would it create a precedent in letting collusion slide, but it would also misrepresent the problem: it's DRM that supports Amazon's monopsony, and only because publishers asked for it.