3 ms·
I'm unfamiliar with any philosophers rejecting the discoveries of linguistics, but this has no bearing on ethics and its problems, nor is linguistics 'Wittgenst
by nathias 1y ago
I'm unfamiliar with any philosophers rejecting the discoveries of linguistics, but this has no bearing on ethics and its problems, nor is linguistics 'Wittgensteinian'.
- tucnak 1y agoYour lack of philosophical education really shows! Linguistics does not "discover" anything; it's purely descriptive, and many philosophers of language in the Cambridge school have, indeed, rejected great bodies thereof. Do you need any pointers? I could oblige.
- nathias 1y agoyour comment misses the point entirely.