3 ms·
Maybe. But you haven't explained why it's a load of bollocks.
by quadhome 14y ago
Maybe.
But you haven't explained why it's a load of bollocks.
- sageikosa 14y agoBecause it is a non-sequitor. It uses hypothetical future bad behavior (which itself isn't proven) to justify an actual "bad" behavior to compensate before it occurs. But, I am anti-anti-trust, so I don't have a problem with collusion of this sort; any inefficient collusion will eventually bloat and be disrupted (unless protected by the government as a sanctioned monopoly).