4 ms·
Sounds like a money making strategy. Also, given how expensive all this shit is if inference costs _more_? That’s not cheap to me. But again the original argum
by techpineapple 1y ago
Sounds like a money making strategy. Also, given how expensive all this shit is if inference costs _more_? That’s not cheap to me.
But again the original argument was that they can run forever because inference is cheap, not cheap enough if you’re losing money on it.
- bigfudge 1y agoEven if the current subsidy is 50%, gpt would be cheap for many applications at twice the price. It will determine adaption, but it wouldn’t prevent me having a personal assistant (and I’m not a 1%er, so that’s a big change)