3 ms·
These particular instructions make me think interesting stuff might happen if one could "convince" the model to generate JSON in these calls.
by EvanAnderson 1y ago
These particular instructions make me think interesting stuff might happen if one could "convince" the model to generate JSON in these calls.
- mrbungie 1y agoI remember accidentally making the model "say" stuff that broke ChatGPT UI, probably it has something to do with that.
- vFunct 1y agoNow I wanna see if it can rename itself to Bobby Tables..
- ludwik 1y agoWhy? The explanation given to the LLM seems truthful: this is a string that is directly displayed to the user (as we know it is), so including json in it will result in a broken visual experience for the user.
- tapland 1y agoI think getting a JSON formatted output costs multiples of a forced plain text Name:Value. Let a regular script parse that and save a lot of money not having chatgpt do hard things.
- jondwillis 1y agoStrict mode, maybe, I don’t think so based on my memory of the implementation. Otherwise it’s JSONSchema validation. Pretty low cost in the scheme of things.
- Blackarea 1y agoEscaping Strings is not an issue. It's guaranteed about UX. Finding a json in your bio is very likely perceived as disconcerting for the user as it implies structured data collection and isn't just the expected plaintext description. The model most likely has a bias of interacting with tools in json or other common text based formats though.
- DiscourseFan 1y agoMost models do, actually. Its a serious problem.