> It is frequently suggested that once one of the AI companies reaches an AGI threshold, they will take off ahead of the rest. Yes. And the fact they're instea

> It is frequently suggested that once one of the AI companies reaches an AGI threshold, they will take off ahead of the rest. Yes. And the fact they're instead clustering simply indicates that they're nowhere near AGI and are hitting diminishing returns, as they've been doing for a long time already. This should be obvious to everyone. I'm fairly sure that none of these companies has been able to use their models as a force multiplier in state-of-the-art AI research. At least not beyond a 1+ε factor. Fuck, they're just barely a force multiplier in mundane coding tasks.