2 ms·

Both this and the other Trump EO that came out today (requiring colleges to report detailed race data to ensure they’re complying with SFFA) are good ideas and

Both this and the other Trump EO that came out today (requiring colleges to report detailed race data to ensure they’re complying with SFFA) are good ideas and democrats should steal them. Don’t let Trump bait you into supporting Wall Street debanking people for their political views. That’s a total loser issue.

jmye 1y ago
Why should banks be required to do business with you (for non-protected class reasons)? Why should Democrats want to make sure that colleges can ignore non-white and non-Asian applicants, regardless of potential ability? Why would Dems support any of this clear and obvious bullshit, that is solely being pushed to distract from other… issues the administration is having?
- rayiner 1y ago
  > Why should banks be required to do business with you (for non-protected class reasons)? Because most people aren’t libertarians and hate Wall Street. It’s a layup. And there’s nothing magic about “protected class reasons.” With respect to private entities, it’s just Congress’s Commerce Clause power. Congress can expand the categories to include whatever it wants. > Why should Democrats want to make sure that colleges can ignore non-white and non-Asian applicants Democrats should want to enforce SFFA, which bans racial preferences, whether those policies favor whites, asians, or anyone else. Not only because it’s the law of the land, and necessary to maintain a functioning multi-ethnic society, but because it’s popular: https://thehill.com/homenews/education/4411246-majority-support-ban-race-college-admissions-poll/ https://thehill.com/homenews/education/4411246-majority-supp... Using racial preferences to create a unified “people of color” political identity loyal to Democrats has failed and it’s time to declare it dead: https://www.latimes.com/delos/story/2025-07-02/pew-research-latino-vote-trump-2024-election-mike-madrid-paola-ramos https://www.latimes.com/delos/story/2025-07-02/pew-research-...

jmye 1y ago

Why should banks be required to do business with you (for non-protected class reasons)? Why should Democrats want to make sure that colleges can ignore non-white and non-Asian applicants, regardless of potential ability? Why would Dems support any of this clear and obvious bullshit, that is solely being pushed to distract from other… issues the administration is having?

rayiner 1y ago
> Why should banks be required to do business with you (for non-protected class reasons)? Because most people aren’t libertarians and hate Wall Street. It’s a layup. And there’s nothing magic about “protected class reasons.” With respect to private entities, it’s just Congress’s Commerce Clause power. Congress can expand the categories to include whatever it wants. > Why should Democrats want to make sure that colleges can ignore non-white and non-Asian applicants Democrats should want to enforce SFFA, which bans racial preferences, whether those policies favor whites, asians, or anyone else. Not only because it’s the law of the land, and necessary to maintain a functioning multi-ethnic society, but because it’s popular: https://thehill.com/homenews/education/4411246-majority-support-ban-race-college-admissions-poll/ https://thehill.com/homenews/education/4411246-majority-supp... Using racial preferences to create a unified “people of color” political identity loyal to Democrats has failed and it’s time to declare it dead: https://www.latimes.com/delos/story/2025-07-02/pew-research-latino-vote-trump-2024-election-mike-madrid-paola-ramos https://www.latimes.com/delos/story/2025-07-02/pew-research-...