2 ms·
You're sort of glossing over the part where this can now be leveraged as a cost-efficient agentic model that performs better than o3. Nobody used o3 for sw agen
by kkukshtel 1y ago
You're sort of glossing over the part where this can now be leveraged as a cost-efficient agentic model that performs better than o3. Nobody used o3 for sw agent tasks due to costs and speed, and this now substantially seems to both improve on o3 AND be significantly cheaper than Claude.
- synapsomorphy 1y agoo3's cost was sliced by 80% a month or so ago and is also cheaper than Claude (the output is even cheaper than GPT-5). It seems more cost efficient but not by much.
- BoorishBears 1y agoThis feels revisionist: no one used it because it wasn't as good.
- extr 1y agoO3 is fantastic at coding tasks, until today it was smartest model in existence. But it works only in few shot conversational scenarios, it's not good at agentic harnesses.
- m3kw9 1y agoYou can use o3 for coding on plus plan almost unlimited or till they throttle
- withinboredom 1y agonot anymore
- m3kw9 1y agowhat do you mean? For CLI or web codex?