Maybe the WP has never heard of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push_poll https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push_poll - or maybe that falls under an "omit any inconve

Maybe the WP has never heard of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push_poll https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push_poll - or maybe that falls under an "omit any inconvenient facts" editorial policy of theirs? This assertion didn't impress me either: > AI could be used to allow legitimate polling calls and texts to go through, while filtering out fraud and scams.