4 ms·

Also, what's this??? https://imgur.com/a/5CF34M6 https://imgur.com/a/5CF34M6

• jasonjmcghee 1y ago
  Deception - guessing it's % of responses that deceived the user / gave misleading information
  • yz-exodao 1y ago
    Sure, but 50.0 > 47.4...
    • jasonjmcghee 1y ago
      Oh man... didn't even notice. I've been deceived. That's bad.
  • deleted 1y ago
    [deleted]
  • godelski 1y ago
    In everything except the first set of bars, bigger bar == bigger number. But also scale is really off... I don't think anything here is proportionally correct even within the same grouping.
• croemer 1y ago
  Imgur is down, hug of death from screenshot links on HN. {"data":{"error":"Imgur is temporarily over capacity. Please try again later."},"success":false,"status":403} Or rate limited.
  • koolala 1y ago
    stats say this image got 500 views. imgur is much much more populated than HN
    • superkuh 1y ago
      In 2015, yes. In 2025? Probably not. Imgur is enshittifying rapidly since reddit started it's own image host. Lots of censorship and corporate gentrification. There's still some hangers on but it's a small group. 15 comments on imgur is a lot nowadays.
  • Anon1096 1y ago
    This is what Imgur shows to blacklisted IPs. You probably have a VPN on that is blocked.
    • croemer 1y ago
      Ugh, why lie to users... Just say the IP is blacklisted. Thanks for the tip btw.
      • hk__2 1y ago
        Because when you know it’s blacklisted you might try with a different IP, whereas if you don’t you will just wait (forever).
        • lucb1e 1y ago
          Imagine we wouldn't tell criminals the law because they might try to find holes... This is just user-hostile and security through obscurity. If someone on HN knows that this is what is shown to banned people then so will the people that scrape or mean harm to imgur
          • dnissley 1y ago
            In a world where we couldn't arrest criminals, only keep track of them in a log book, yeah that's probably exactly what we'd do
          • hk__2 1y ago
            There’s no law here, just someone trying to protect their website.
  • card_zero 1y ago
    https://i.postimg.cc/mrF87xpQ/YMADeqH.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/mrF87xpQ/YMADeqH.jpg
    • dvfjsdhgfv 1y ago
      Lol this is pure vibegraphing!
• clolege 1y ago
  Not GPT-5 trying to deceive us about how deceptive it is?
  • therein 1y ago
    Why would you think it is anything special? Just because Sam Altman said so? The same guy who told us he was scared of releasing GPT-2.5 but now calling its abilities "toddler/kindergarten" level?
    • CamperBob2 1y ago
      If you were one of the very first people to see an LLM in action, even a crappy one, and you didn't have second thoughts about what you were doing and how far things were going to go, what would that say about you?
      • therein 1y ago
        It is just dishonest rhetoric no matter what. He is the most insincere guy in the industry, somehow manages to come off even less sincere than the lawnmower Larry Ellison. At least that guy is honest about not having any morals.
    • clolege 1y ago
      My comment was mostly a joke. I don't think there's anything "special" about GPT-5. But these models have exhibited a few surprising emergent traits, and it seems plausible to me that at one point they could intentionally deceive users in the course of exploring their boundaries. Is it that far fetched?
      • therein 1y ago
        There is no intent, nor is there a mechanism for intent. They don't do long term planning nor do they alter themselves due to things they go through during inference. Therefore there cannot be intentional deception they partake in. The system may generate a body of text that a human reader may attribute to deceptiveness but there is no intent.