3 ms·
I mean that's just the consequence of releasing a new model every couple months. If Open AI stayed mostly silent since the GPT-4 release (like they did for most
by famouswaffles 1y ago
I mean that's just the consequence of releasing a new model every couple months. If Open AI stayed mostly silent since the GPT-4 release (like they did for most iterations) and only now released 5 then nobody would be complaining about weak gains in benchmarks.
- moduspol 1y agoWell it was their choice to call it GPT 5 and not GPT 4.2.
- famouswaffles 1y agoIt is significantly better than 4, so calling it 4.2 would be rather silly.
- amilios 1y agoIs it? That's not super obvious from the results they're showing.
- famouswaffles 1y agoYes it is, if we're talking about the original GPT-4 release or even GPT-4o. What about the results they've shown is not obvious?
- amilios 1y agoI see incremental improvements in almost all domains?
- jononor 1y agoIf everyone else had stayed silent as well, then I would agree. But as it is right now they are juuust about managing to match the current pace of the other contenders. Which actually is fine, but they have previously set quite high expectations. So some will probably be disappointed at this.
- cardine 1y agoIf they had stayed silent since GPT-4, nobody would care what OpenAI was releasing as they would have become completely irrelevant compared to Gemini/Claude.