4 ms·
Its an advertisement so of course its shot with proper gear. Nokia didn't make it themselves, the production company would have. A few years ago ads for the Pa
by disordinary 14y ago
Its an advertisement so of course its shot with proper gear. Nokia didn't make it themselves, the production company would have.
A few years ago ads for the Panasonic GH1 were revealed to have been shot with a Canon 5d - Panasonic said that the advertising company pitches the idea and are left to their own devices to shoot it.
- tomflack 14y agoIf you're highlighting the quality of, or a specific feature of your smartphone's camera, the advertising brief should have at the very top: "You will use the product (Nokia Lumia 920 Pureview) to shoot example clips. No other cameras are to be used as a stand-in for the cellphone." You're insanely incompetent if you can't let your creative agency know this. Your creative agency is insanely stupid if they think it's okay to pass footage from another camera off as from the product being advertised.
- megablast 14y agoYes, how can it be Nokia's fault. They hire an advertising company, which of course they have absolutely no control over. Except they do. They can dictate whatever they want to the ad company, and they have to do it. You know why? Because Nokia is paying the fucking bills. This is a disgraceful fake.
- mbreese 14y agoNokia didn't have to run the ad. They are responsible for what their ads say. And if they tried to push that video as coming from their camera, they are at fault. Nokia can probably be expecting a big fine over this.