The article contains libelous claims without substantiating them or providing evidence. It links to harassment content on YouTube doing the same. Both the artic

The article contains libelous claims without substantiating them or providing evidence. It links to harassment content on YouTube doing the same. Both the article and those videos blatantly fabricate many things including parts which are self-evidently inaccurate. We have provided a lot of evidence and you can disprove the rest through basic research. Demanding we provide evidence every time we respond to libelous claims lacking evidence is strange. The people attacking us this way haven't provided evidence for their claims and in fact what they show counters their own claims since it doesn't match what they're claiming it shows. They've disproven their own claims in their own content.