3 ms·
If they had been using a NAS, the outrage would have been against the NAS manufacturer? I don’t understand the point of this article.
by SanjayMehta 1y ago
If they had been using a NAS, the outrage would have been against the NAS manufacturer?
I don’t understand the point of this article.
- laimewhisps 1y ago[flagged]
- SanjayMehta 1y agoAs CEO his responsibility is to his shareholders and employees to turn a profit. What next? We are anti-cat, so you can only store dog pictures?
- laimewhisps 1y agoHe has to operate both within the confines of the law and the values espoused by their brand. This is neither, it's facilitating a crime against humanity and engaging in mass surveillance.
- SanjayMehta 1y agoLaws, yes. Values are subjective.
- laimewhisps 1y agoSpying on civilians and genocide are bad for the brand.
- SanjayMehta 1y agoBy this logic every government (especially the US and almost all European governments) in the world is guilty Every vendor who even supplied a paperclip to any such government is guilty. Where do you draw the line?
- laimewhisps 1y agoMass surveillance and genocide.