4 ms·
If it wasn't ChatGPT, those students are more than likely to be the kind that buys solutions so that they still don't have to work. Some people somehow think t
by self_awareness 1y ago
If it wasn't ChatGPT, those students are more than likely to be the kind that buys solutions so that they still don't have to work.
Some people somehow think that having more while working less is an act of resourcefulness. To some extent it maybe is, because we shouldn't work for work's sake, but making "working less" a life goal doesn't seem right to me.
- tossandthrow 1y agoThe difference in 20$ and 200$ + significantly more effort. I don't think these students necessarily would have bought.
- rekenaut 1y agoThe difference is much greater than this. It’s $20/month for a machine that can provide instant answers to any prompt in any topic hundreds of times a month vs $200/assignment that may take days to received and you have to edit yourself if you want a change made. I think it’s quite clear that most students who are using AI now to generate assignments would not have bought.
- PeterStuer 1y agoBefore LLMs they copy pasted straight from Google or Wolfram Alpha.
- rrgok 1y agoWhy "working less" should not be a life goal? I got a undergraduate degree because I can earn more, but I don't need more money. I need more free time. With increased salary I can work less.