2 ms·
You'd define architecture-specific typedefs to deal with these cases in a portable way. The C standard already has types like int_fast8_t that are similar in p
by zozbot234 1y ago
You'd define architecture-specific typedefs to deal with these cases in a portable way. The C standard already has types like int_fast8_t that are similar in principle.
- kazinator 1y agoSee, why would you need an "architecture specific typedef" in order to represent the day of the month, or the number of arguments in main "in a portable way". int does it in a portable way already. It's just muddled thinking.
- zozbot234 1y agoint is architecture specific too, and it's been "muddled" plenty due to backward compatibility concerns. Using typedefs throughout would be a cleaner choice if we were starting from scratch.