2 ms·
I see the appeal. Imagine all the points of failure that are spread out all over the place in classical Unix. Systemd kind of combs these all into one place so
by ants_everywhere 1y ago
I see the appeal. Imagine all the points of failure that are spread out all over the place in classical Unix.
Systemd kind of combs these all into one place so there's a single point of failure. Now there's just one of them, so it's DRY.
- throw0101a 1y ago> Systemd kind of combs these all into one place so there's a single point of failure. Now there's just one of them, so it's DRY. A single point of failure is… good? (Or is your statement an example of Poe's law?)
- sgarland 1y agoI begrudgingly accept systemd for service control, but that’s about it. The other “points of failure” you mention are all incredibly well-tested and battle-hardened.