6 ms·
It's definitely more of an education issue. I still run into "IT" people that instinctively disable IPv6 no matter what. How do we fix this? The sad thing is IP
by icedchai 1y ago
It's definitely more of an education issue. I still run into "IT" people that instinctively disable IPv6 no matter what. How do we fix this? The sad thing is IPv6 is actually easier in many respects: subnetting is simpler, no NAT hackery, SLAAC...
- raron 1y ago> I still run into "IT" people that instinctively disable IPv6 no matter what. How do we fix this? - force ISPs to follow RIPE guidance on addressing (static prefix, at least /56 for every site, DHCPv6-PD) - force the manufacturers of low-end routers (e.g. provided by ISPs) to have good IPv6 support (good firewalling, DHCPv6-PD, mDNS, PCP/UPNP, advertise static ULA prefix to have working local network even if internet connection is cut) - force Android team to support DHCPv6 - force browsers to support full IPv6 addresses in URLs / URIs (link local addresses, scope id) - force avahi / mDNS to support IPv6 scope id - make operating system manufacturers to have a better unified socket API which can resolve any type of address (IPv4, IPv6, DNS, mDNS, etc. maybe even URLs directly) and deprecate all other API - make software developers to use this new API and don't try to parse IP addresses or URLs themselves - have a good solution for multi-homing / WAN failover (without BGP and PI address space) - have a good solution for mobile / roaming devices (phones, notebooks) and maybe we could make IPv6 stable and universally working (Waste a /40 for every company, get low on available prefixes and start over designing IPv8 to have 256 bit addresses with 184 bit host part...)