3 ms·
Yes, because the author of the comment didn’t explicitly carve out a moment to comment that Java/Flash were not great for accessibility, it must mean that in th
by wpm 1y ago
Yes, because the author of the comment didn’t explicitly carve out a moment to comment that Java/Flash were not great for accessibility, it must mean that in their hypothetical world where web applications that needed rich interaction and client side processing where based on Java/Flash type runtimes, it would have stayed shit for accessibility.
I’m sure the person you were referring to doesn’t want to make the web shit for the blind. Calm down
- postalrat 1y agoTo them the web probably isn't much more than doomscrolling video content.