> Do you know of another version control system that is superior to git? I'm quite partial to Mercurial myself, and jj seems to be up and coming. But in any ev

> Do you know of another version control system that is superior to git? I'm quite partial to Mercurial myself, and jj seems to be up and coming. But in any event, the idea that even if git were a perfect VC for programming, the idea that it is therefore a good tool for legislation is rather suspect. And yes, it absolutely does matter when Section 11.2.33 paragraph 6 (in rev 19928), becomes Section 32.1.4 paragraph 8 (in rev 200480). Lawyers and lobbyists get paid good money to track stuff like that. For one thing, even if one particular person proposes a change, things like cosponsors, exchanged and proxy votes, wide commenting and committee authorship make the workflow, at the very least, not a natural fit for git. Sure, it could probably be shoe-horned in. But a good system to be required by law? Not really. >>>>I wanted to do the Constitution... > Maybe you got my stuff confused with someone else's. Speaking of getting one person's stuff confused with someone else's.