3 ms·
That's actually no longer true, due to changes in voting demographics for both parties: >The best evidence seems to be that the impact of restrictive laws is m
by gruez 1y ago
That's actually no longer true, due to changes in voting demographics for both parties:
>The best evidence seems to be that the impact of restrictive laws is minimal. An analysis published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics of 1.6bn voting records from every state in America found that strict voter ID rules, on average, neither significantly suppressed votes nor prevented fraud. Nor do ID laws hurt Democrats any longer, according to research by Jeffrey Harden and Alejandra Campos. Whereas in 2010 voter ID laws reduced Democratic vote share by 3%, by 2020 they increased it slightly. Because of the changes in party voting coalitions, the overall effect of the next phase of even tighter voting rules could now “easily be a wash” when it comes to benefiting one party or the other, says Nicholas Stephanopoulos, who studies elections at Harvard University.
https://archive.is/iPSiY https://archive.is/iPSiY