> You're saying that increasing supply (all else being equal) will increase prices? Yep. Exactly. With the caveat: the increase happens by increasing the _dens

> You're saying that increasing supply (all else being equal) will increase prices? Yep. Exactly. With the caveat: the increase happens by increasing the _density_. > Seems like that turns standard econ on its head, so can you help me understand who you reached that conclusion? Here's another example. Suppose you give a billion dollars to everyone. Will everyone just become rich? Housing is similar. When you build denser housing, it increases the attractiveness of the area for employers. They get access to a larger labor pool, so companies near dense housing are long-term more competitive. This in turn increases the housing price, as workers want to live closer to employers. Rinse, wash, repeat. The end result: no large city managed to lower down housing costs by increasing density. It's a simple verifiable fact. Edit: I checked data for Western Europe, Russia, US, Japan. It's possible that some citi in India or Malaysia managed to do that. But I don't have data for them.