3 ms·
Even though it goes against all my beliefs and values, I still see it primarily as a desperate attempt to gain at least some means of control over encrypted too
by hsuduebc2 1y ago
Even though it goes against all my beliefs and values, I still see it primarily as a desperate attempt to gain at least some means of control over encrypted tools — which are, in fact, constantly used for criminal activity. The endlessly recycled “think of the children” argument is laughably pathetic. I don't understand why they don't present the real and much more reasonable justifications — such as terrorism in Europe or the spread of propaganda, which is a genuine issue here. But those reasons likely don’t sell as well with populists.
That said, I wouldn’t be surprised if this turned into a European version of the Patriot Act — where the state takes advantage of the fact that people have become desensitized, and everyone ends up being monitored 24/7. In the end, every citizen would be under surveillance, while criminals would simply download an app that doesn’t comply with this absurd requirement.
- wqaatwt 1y agoNot incompetent criminals will just workaround, there is no way to avoid that besides 1984 style universal surveillance.
- hsuduebc2 1y agoExactly. Only outcome is more surveillance for others with zero effect on the problem itself.
- nickslaughter02 1y ago> the spread of propaganda, which is a genuine issue here Now we are policing speech?
- hsuduebc2 1y agoBecause I perceive someone spreading lies with a clear malicious intent as a problem I'm policing a speech? Ok.
- nickslaughter02 1y agoLies according to whom? Are you the judge? You fight lies by presenting clear evidence to the contrary, not by censorship.