And most of those Google images don't even look particularly "spicy" or sexualized. (Except of course for the US American tradition of considering any instance

And most of those Google images don't even look particularly "spicy" or sexualized. (Except of course for the US American tradition of considering any instance of partial nudity as pornographic, which manifests itself e.g. in YouTube allowing a significant amount of violence while videos with any uncensored breasts are immediately taken down. Which looks rather prudish from a European perspective.) > Even if people are still outraged, I should also point out that we're trusting what the reporting is saying without any evidence... The reporters could have easily included the offending images in censored form. The fact that they didn't is somewhat telling.