3 ms·
Okay, this question probably should be asked from a throwaway, but I'll bite: do you consider imagining some person, without the consent of that person, engagin
by Joker_vD 1y ago
Okay, this question probably should be asked from a throwaway, but I'll bite: do you consider imagining some person, without the consent of that person, engaging in a sexual act, to be immoral? Putting this imagination of yours onto a paper, in the form of words or drawing?
Or is the problem here is the fact that such imagining was "commissioned" to a third party (I believe I have seen this opinion somewhere long time ago)?
- JohnFen 1y ago> do you consider imagining some person, without the consent of that person, engaging in a sexual act, to be immoral? Of course not. But that's a universe apart from producing and distributing sexual images of unconsenting others.
- ttemPumpinRary 1y agoIs it though, if your neural link uploads your subconscious into the cloud for safety ?
- npteljes 1y agoYes, third party automated "imagining" is the problem: https://www.citizen.org/news/two-thirds-of-states-enact-bills-protecting-public-from-deepfake-porn/ https://www.citizen.org/news/two-thirds-of-states-enact-bill...