4 ms·
How is this its own article and not a single sentence on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybersquatting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybersquatting ?
by ants_everywhere 1y ago
How is this its own article and not a single sentence on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybersquatting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybersquatting ?
- sphars 1y agoIt's in the first sentence? > Slopsquatting is a type of cybersquatting.
- nemomarx 1y agoRight but why not a redirect to that one and a subsection? I feel like this is going to fall under notability eventually
- ants_everywhere 1y agoI'm asking more how this meets the notability requirements for a separate Wikipedia article. I'm all for having lots of small Wikipedia articles, but the past few years they've been tending toward combining small articles together. And this is more like a dictionary entry than an encyclopedia entry.
- Mistletoe 1y agoI think it’s much better like this. It is it’s own fascinating thing and not lost in a long general Wikipedia entry.
- blueflow 1y agoIt needs to be a big thing on its own so security people can be onto something important.