Everyone is suggesting that AI rejected this candidate but that brings up two points: 1) Is the hiring AI so incompetent that it did not realize it had a "S-ti

Everyone is suggesting that AI rejected this candidate but that brings up two points: 1) Is the hiring AI so incompetent that it did not realize it had a "S-tier pull" in the process and should have immediately prioritized the find? 2) Was the candidate's submission so bad that a reviewing AI couldn't even tell the massive relevance he had to their work? I suppose, alternatively, Anthropic could just not really care about Claude Desktop enough to hire a specialist for one part of the stack. Perhaps they're looking for much more "full stack AI" who can do a lot. They have 350-400 total engineers, is that enough to hire a specialist for Claude Desktop? I guess my question is: Did the AI fail, did the candidate fail, or did the AI work well and we just don't know the criteria it was succeeding in using.