2 ms·
It's not even remotely comparable. Chess players are more like athletes. You need to be top 0.01% to make a living. You also need to start at a very, very youn
by raincole 1y ago
It's not even remotely comparable.
Chess players are more like athletes. You need to be top 0.01% to make a living. You also need to start at a very, very young age.
If the future for commercial artists/composers is comparable to chess players then the GP is doom already.
- 1shooner 1y ago>You need to be top 0.01% to make a living. The point was that people do it for the enjoyment of learning and improving, not because they are compensated.
- raincole 1y ago> Game devs will go with what they can afford and who can blame them? From the GP. They clearly expect to be compensated.
- prmoustache 1y agoOnly a tiny fraction of artists, and not even necessarily those you would call the best ones, are making a living of their art/performances/work. So yes that is still comparable.