5 ms·
You asked whether it's really better than "what we already had with search engines, online documentation and online Q&A sites". How have you found it not to be
by antonvs 1y ago
You asked whether it's really better than "what we already had with search engines, online documentation and online Q&A sites".
How have you found it not to be significantly better for those purposes?
The "not good enough for you to trust" is a strange claim. No matter what source of info you use, outside of official documentation, you have to assess its quality and correctness. LLM output is no different.
- bluefirebrand 1y ago> How have you found it not to be significantly better for those purposes Not even remotely > LLM output is no different It is different A search result might take me to the wrong answer but an LLM might just invent nonsense answers This is a fundamentally different thing and is more difficult to detect imo
- mgfist 1y ago> A search result might take me to the wrong answer but an LLM might just invent nonsense answers > This is a fundamentally different thing and is more difficult to detect imo 99% of the time it's not. You validate and correct/accept like you would any other suggestion.