> Realistically, the answers the students gave the teacher were probably motivated by the practical benefits that come with giving teachers the answers they wan

> Realistically, the answers the students gave the teacher were probably motivated by the practical benefits that come with giving teachers the answers they want to hear…bullshit questions are likely to produce bullshit answers. Like I said to you in another comment, this is a fundamental misunderstanding of the article. At least one of the polls was anonymous, too. There were no punishments in the class for using AI, in fact at least a couple of the students later revealed they had been using AI for everything. This wasn't a "bullshit inducing poll", it was an experiment in perception vs reality, and how they modified those perceptions after the experiment had run its course.