3 ms·
Zuckerberg explains a few of the reasons here: https://www.dwarkesh.com/p/mark-zuckerberg#:~:text=As%20long%20as%20it%27s%20helping%20us%20then%20yeah. https:/
by LordDragonfang 1y ago
Zuckerberg explains a few of the reasons here:
https://www.dwarkesh.com/p/mark-zuckerberg#:~:text=As%20long%20as%20it%27s%20helping%20us%20then%20yeah. https://www.dwarkesh.com/p/mark-zuckerberg#:~:text=As%20long...
The short version is that is you give a product to open source, they can and will donate time and money to improving your product, and the ecosystem around it, for free, and you get to reap those benefits. Llama has already basically won that space (the standard way of running open models is llama.cpp), so OpenAI have finally realized they're playing catch-up (and last quarter's SOTA isn't worth much revenue to them when there's a new SOTA, so they may as well give it away while it can still crack into the market)
- ArtTimeInvestor 1y agoI understand the rationale behind open sourcing llama.cpp. Because it has a lock-in effect. But I don't see how open sourcing weights has a lock-in effect. In fact, it seems OpeanAI's open models can be run on llama.cpp. So by offereing them, they make llama.cpp even MORE useful. Instead of driving developers towards their own tech.