3 ms·

Even there, LZ4 is probably better.

• hinkley 1y ago
  You think LZ4 is more portable than zlib? I'm gonna need some citations on that. zlib is 30 years old, according to Wikipedia. And that's technically wrong since 'zlib' was factored out of gzip (nearly 33 years old) for use in libpng, which is also 30 years old.
  • adgjlsfhk1 1y ago
    not more portable, but probably faster in resource constrained environments
  • duskwuff 1y ago
    A basic LZ4 decompressor is on the order of a few dozen lines of code. It's exceptionally easy to implement.
  • moonshadow565 1y ago
    Just because its old doesn't mean it's more portable. If anything it makes me think it's even less portable.