> implies that companies have 100x the things to be developed productively, what if that isn't the case? Good point. I think that's demonstrably already a prob

> implies that companies have 100x the things to be developed productively, what if that isn't the case? Good point. I think that's demonstrably already a problem. Software products are notoriously prone to enshittification in part because successful companies build up vast development teams that have to somehow justify their existence with continuous feature churn.