3 ms·
Not surprised this is posted by a throwaway account. I would think this is Rush himself, if he was alive of course.
by avgDev 1y ago
Not surprised this is posted by a throwaway account. I would think this is Rush himself, if he was alive of course.
- tokai 1y agoStart-up idea: LLM service that will post online to defend you after you die.
- mobilemidget 1y agoOr nice idea for a new black mirror episode.
- throwawayoldie 1y agoIn the Year Of Our Lord 2025, there is no difference between the two.
- red-iron-pine 1y agovarious estates (e.g. Tolken, etc) already have trusts that can and do hire lawyers and even marketing firms. in this case you'd just hire a marketing org that uses AI a lot and hope that the trust has enough money to keep them doing their job for a while
- throw9394944 1y agoMaybe listen to some of his interviews. His opinion about "old" experts is on record. And old Oceangate HR pages are still in archives. But again, this is not juzt about CEO (he deserves the blame), but why he was able to operate for so long, and why his critics vere silenced!
- red-iron-pine 1y agohis critics were silenced? bro they were loud as hell and consistently so. the dude did everything he could to fly under the radar, but only just enough. it is why the report is so damning -- much of what he did was just blatantly, balls-out bad, and all of the signs were there consistently.
- watwut 1y agoBut that person is right. Co owners, board and even layer that knowingly helped to relatiate against whistle blower with fake accusations are all guilty too. At least in the ethical sense. Rush is dead, so it is comfortable for the above to blame only him. The board knew about the issues. The layer knew the accusation is fake and designed to shut up the whistleblower.