3 ms·

Came to mention the same... really like FastEndpoints myself a lot.

• pier25 1y ago
  Same although Minimal APIs are slowly getting there. In dotnet 10 we will finally get validation.
  • tracker1 1y ago
    Fair enough... I'd probably stick to Minimal APIs if there were fewer than 5-10 routes in a smaller service. But, with the startup and runtime overhead of .Net, I'm inclined to prefer more monolithic approaches for most general use. Just without weighing it down with a lot of heavy handed enterprisey abstractions. Edit: Of course, Aspire definitely looks interesting for more complex needs.
    • pier25 1y ago
      AFAIK FastEndpoints uses Minimal APIs... so wouldn't the overhead be similar?
      • tracker1 1y ago
        They do, and it's not so much about the overhead in terms of performance so much as the cognitive load of spreading out what would otherwise be a smaller/simpler codebase.