4 ms·
I'm a little confused. A purely OO programmer mostly in .Net land sees one cute JS trick example and declares Namespaces obsolete? I'm not sure which side of t
by mindstab 14y ago
I'm a little confused. A purely OO programmer mostly in .Net land sees one cute JS trick example and declares Namespaces obsolete? I'm not sure which side of this is more funny/confusing: that there are plenty of other languages doing this already or that there are others just not using namespaces already/forever. Or that even ones that don't exactly use them still sometimes replicate some of their features just with long naming conventions...
It seems a very personal epiphany, not really news worthy tho. It's kind of like an Onion title "Area man discovers X" where X is common facet of knowledge to the rest.
- B-Con 14y ago> A purely OO programmer mostly in .Net land sees one cute JS trick example and declares Namespaces obsolete? Yep. The majority of "X is obsolete" or "Y is the way of the future" blog posts are like this. HN loves to be bleeding edge, so anything saying "out with the old" gets submitted here.