> did the author oversleep the past several centuries? did you? this is one of the central points argued by luddites since the industrial revolution began. >

> did the author oversleep the past several centuries? did you? this is one of the central points argued by luddites since the industrial revolution began. > I guess what I'm trying to say is that LLMs are not inherently incapable of writing well. i don't know if that's quite the argument the author is making; more that LLMs are inherently incapable of producing content of value (subjective, but I tend to agree). the adage i've heard that i like quite a bit is "if it's not worth writing, it's not worth reading".