4 ms·
I don't think he was a quack, he wasn't selling anything counterfactual or deceptive. He was outside the mainstream, but more in the sense of a specialist than
by myself248 1y ago
I don't think he was a quack, he wasn't selling anything counterfactual or deceptive. He was outside the mainstream, but more in the sense of a specialist than a fraudster. And his novel funding model allowed care when none else could be afforded.
- krisoft 1y ago> he wasn't selling anything counterfactual or deceptive He was saying he is a physician, and by all evidence he wasn't. That's both deceptive and counterfactual.
- opwieurposiu 1y agoI think 6,500 alive babies is probably a better credential then a diploma on a wall.
- nkrisc 1y agoDoesn’t make it not strictly fraudulent.
- afthonos 1y agoDon’t worry, the world will never lack for Great Bureaucrats to tut-tut 6500 babies irregularly saved, and to regulate away the likelihood of such atrocities happening on the regular.
- krisoft 1y agoThat is the “competent” part from the “competent quack”. Obviously if we can believe his numbers, that is.