3 ms·
That raises a really interesting liability question: the AI is acting in an official capacity, and it's not unreasonable to believe an interviewer when they dis
by handoflixue 1y ago
That raises a really interesting liability question: the AI is acting in an official capacity, and it's not unreasonable to believe an interviewer when they discuss salary or offer you a job. If the AI says you're hired, how much trouble is the company in when they try to claw that back after you've already clocked in for your first shift?
- makeitdouble 1y ago> the AI is acting in an official capacity Probably not. The same way if your first interviewer tells you the company will pay 5 billions dollars each year if you tattoo their logo on your neck and no official contract is otherwise exchanged, when you come get your check the only one potentially liable will be the dipshit that lied to you. There is such thing as an oral contract, but it will be a hard battle to prove the company is on the hook and not the individual/AI who misled you.
- black_puppydog 1y agoThat would be an acceptable outcome. I'll accept the 5 billion whether they come from the employer or from OpenAI. :)
- makeitdouble 1y agoAt this point I'll assume each AI instance is liable for itself for what it says/does. Conveniently it dies with the process that spawned it.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]