3 ms·

Now add an "open source" LLM.

• nailer 1y ago
  I think you’re being downvoted because not everybody on HN knows that Llama is not open source, despite Yan LeCunn ignoring the OSI and continually attempting to tell everyone it is. https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-ope... https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-license-is-still-not-open-source https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-license-is-still-not...
  • fragmede 1y ago
    downloadable ≠ open source. https://www.downloadableisnotopensource.org/ https://www.downloadableisnotopensource.org/
    • nailer 1y ago
      Yes. That's what I'm saying (more specifically, I am saying the OSD defines open source).
  • deleted 1y ago
    [deleted]
• koolala 1y ago
  If LLM output is unlicensed, maybe an LLM could one day be trained on the public output of every existing LLM. A second gen LLM that can confidently identify its own kind alongside public domain human ideas.