> I think they meant that Verdana is a nice replacement for Times if you care about readability and presentation. But that's not true at all! Maybe the point w

> I think they meant that Verdana is a nice replacement for Times if you care about readability and presentation. But that's not true at all! Maybe the point was that web should use sans-serif instead of serif, but that statement (and I hope I'm not making a straw man here) is as a blanket invalid as well (in my opinion, ofc).