4 ms·
> I’ll ask them something about the design and they’ll reply: “IDK Claude did that.” "Then your job is to go ask Claude and get back to me. On that note, if th
by nlawalker 1y ago
> I’ll ask them something about the design and they’ll reply: “IDK Claude did that.”
"Then your job is to go ask Claude and get back to me. On that note, if that's what I'm paying you for now, I might be paying you too much..."
I'm really interested to see how the intersection of AI and accountability develops over the next few years. It seems like everyone's primary job will effectively be taking accountability for the AI they're driving, and the pay will be a function of how much and what kind of accountability you're taking and the overall stakes.
- moritzwarhier 1y agoI hope so, in reality, people who review code are not always the superiors of the other party :) Not meaning to put on a holier-than-thou hat here. But I hated this many times already. E.g. having to approve code that contains useless comments that were clearly generated by AI, but on the other hand, it's nitpicking to bring it up during review... If my colleagues would do that more often and for more parts of the code, that's where I really start getting inclined to look for a new job.