3 ms·
I guess it's good for "Dreamweaver 2.0" in the sense that it produces plain HTML. But my understanding is most serious web applications use a framework of some
by wiradikusuma 1y ago
I guess it's good for "Dreamweaver 2.0" in the sense that it produces plain HTML. But my understanding is most serious web applications use a framework of some sort, such as React, Vue, or Svelte, and each is opinionated.
- rane 1y agoThere's this one new cool technology that could be just the thing for converting the HTML to use web framework of preference.
- jagged-chisel 1y ago> … most serious web applications use a framework of some sort … So many things wrong with this sentiment. Define “serious.” Do people think it’s just not possible to make web apps without frameworks? Take the output from this tool and adapt it to whatever framework you want … if you feel that’s necessary.
- pzo 1y agoIt's so much harder to make very accurate image to plain HTML conversion than plain HTML to react et at. LLM are very good with translating between different web frameworks.