'violate' is still not the preferred nomenclature IP lawyer Robert Platt Bell uses it: http://robertplattbell.blogspot.com/2008/09/copyright-primer.html http:/

'violate' is still not the preferred nomenclature IP lawyer Robert Platt Bell uses it: http://robertplattbell.blogspot.com/2008/09/copyright-primer.html http://robertplattbell.blogspot.com/2008/09/copyright-primer... Since most acts of infringement by Photocopier are de minimis and difficult to trace, we all have become comfortable making copies without thinking about whether our actions comprise a Copyright violation. By posting these tracts on the web, the dissenter effectively made an infinite number of copies of the tracts, thus creating an egregious Copyright violation. Similarly, uploading Copyrighted music to a website for redistribution, or operating a website where Copyrighted music is freely distributed (without permission) is an egregious violation of Copyright laws. the idea of distributing music for free (as in the original Napster model) just wouldn't work; and is a clear violation of Copyright law.