>Or is there a balance between the owner's rights, who bears the content production and hosting/serving costs, and the rights of the end user who wishes to bene

>Or is there a balance between the owner's rights, who bears the content production and hosting/serving costs, and the rights of the end user who wishes to benefit from that content? If you believe in this principle, fair enough, but are you going to apply this consistently? If it's fair game for a blog to restrict access to AI agents, what does that mean for other user agents that companies disagree with, like browsers with adblock? Does it just boil down to "it's okay if a person does it but not okay if a big evil corporation does it?"