This paper centers "novelty" but also finds that human ideas are more feasible, and that LLM-generated ideas are not diverse and that LLMs cannot reliably evalu

This paper centers "novelty" but also finds that human ideas are more feasible, and that LLM-generated ideas are not diverse and that LLMs cannot reliably evaluate ideas. None of the ideas were actually evaluated by performing experiments either. Pretty much what I would expect. The paper also seems to be doing exactly what I described, I don't understand how the technique is better than that?