3 ms·
[flagged]
by jnsie 1y ago
[flagged]
- bombcar 1y agoSuffixing "fact" makes it sound like marketing fakeness - fact!
- szszrk 1y agoWhat show does come close in quality of production? Art, morale and educational value, actual fun ideas on how to play (some are impossible to reproduce, but still), consequence in plot over the seasons and even merchandise? Plus Polish dubbing that I use is of insane quality.
- citizenkeen 1y agoThey weren’t talking about Bluey, they were talking about a writing technique
- jnsie 1y agoIt's not about the merit of the argument but rather the act of shutting down any argument by declaring something as a fact. It's completely unnecessary and quite off-putting.
- conductr 1y agoI don’t feel like it’s unjustly trying to assert Bluey an unfitting credit at all. Instead I feel like the use of “fact” here is a nod to how thoroughly this has been discussed and how common knowledge it has become, at least to anyone who knows what Bluey is, thus preemptively eliminating the need to explain what Bluey is to that part of the audience that found themselves reading an article about the art process of a show that they are unaware of in the first place. To those readers, it’s a concise cue to go do your own research if you’re lacking that context before getting too far into the article.