4 ms·
What, surely you’re not implying that bangers like the following are GPT artifacts!? “The changes aren’t just cosmetic; they represent a fundamental shift in h
by Our_Benefactors 1y ago
What, surely you’re not implying that bangers like the following are GPT artifacts!? “The changes aren’t just cosmetic; they represent a fundamental shift in how we approach server-side JavaScript development.”
- jameshart 1y agoAnd now we need to throw the entire article out because we have no idea whether any of these features are just hallucinations.
- drewbitt 1y agoI think we have enough node developers here to know its truthfulness.
- JoshuaDavid 1y agoI'm not sure - a lot of the top comments are saying that this article is great and they learned a lot of new things. Which is great, as long as the things they learned are true things.
- int_19h 1y agoYou don't know if the author knows what they're talking about with or without AI in the picture.
- jameshart 1y agoTrue! But writing an egregiously erroneous blogpost used to take actual effort. The existence of a blogpost was a form of proof of work that a human at least thought they knew enough about a topic to write it down and share it. Now the existence of this blogpost is only evidence that the author has sufficient AI credits they are able to throw some release notes at Claude and generate some markdown, which is not really differentiating.