2 ms·

Impossible to measure. Anyone can declare victory and find evidence to support it.

• ninetyninenine 1y ago
  I believe there's still ways to engage in conversation/debate on good faith and match and rank things based off of qualitative evidence. We may not be able to measure it but most people can see a rough line of overall progress.
  • techpineapple 1y ago
    “but most people can see a rough line of overall progress.” This idea is the core to my argument. That the bias of what can you see is creating a false sense of progress. I think my core argument would be progress is an asymptote, so you might say loosely I agree with you (yes of course there are always optimizations you can eke out) but at what cost, and is the asymptote approaching something that looks more like a thing that can solve all problems in theory but not in practice, getting better and better at solving problems in a laboratory, or getting better and better at solving problems we know the answer to, but never gets serious traction at solving novel problems or working in the real world(outside its core skill set; generating text)
    • ninetyninenine 1y ago
      We can never know when an asymptote will occur or if we're in one. There's simply not enough information as noise often makes it look like we're on an asymptote when in reality we are not. Asymptotes only exist in hindsight. By probability almost all time on a curve is spent NOT approaching an asymptote. So the bet with the highest probability of being true is that we are not approaching one. >but never gets serious traction at solving novel problems or working in the real world(outside its core skill set; generating text) This isn't true. Transformers now power self driving. I already stopped using Uber in SF. All my taxi rides are driven by AI.